<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>bbgm - the discussion - Latest Comments in Your personal health: The healthcare social graph</title><link>http://mndoci.disqus.com/</link><description>At the interface of science and computing</description><atom:link href="https://mndoci.disqus.com/your_personal_health_the_healthcare_social_graph/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:03:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Your personal health: The healthcare social graph</title><link>http://mndoci.com/2007/12/10/you-personal-health-the-healthcare-social-graph/#comment-1307286</link><description>&lt;p&gt;David&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I read your review.  I won't be surprised if there is a generational divide, esp in the social networking apects (probably depends on how they are presented).  What I did really like about the site was the relative sparse design, and the search, which you probably put through the works a little more than I did.  I recorded a quick screencast, which you can find &lt;a href="http://mndoci.com/blog/2008/01/07/your-personal-health-imedix-redux/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://mndoci.com/blog/2008/01/07/your-personal-health-imedix-redux/"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mndoci</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:03:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Your personal health: The healthcare social graph</title><link>http://mndoci.com/2007/12/10/you-personal-health-the-healthcare-social-graph/#comment-1307284</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I, um, had a &lt;a href="http://venturebeat.com/2008/01/17/imedix-combines-health-search-and-community-neither-well/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://venturebeat.com/2008/01/17/imedix-combines-health-search-and-community-neither-well/"&gt;somewht different take&lt;/a&gt; on iMedix, which struck me as kind of clunky -- the search really doesn't work well at the moment, and the history of user-graded search hasn't been a particularly happy one so far -- and a bit on the creepy side as well. It'll be interesting to watch it grow, but I can't help wondering if there's a serious generational divide that's going to limit its popularity, since after all it's older people who tend to get sick more often.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Hamilton</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:27:11 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>