<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>bbgm - the discussion - Latest Comments in Why I should get a beta for Twine?</title><link>http://mndoci.disqus.com/</link><description>At the interface of science and computing</description><atom:link href="https://mndoci.disqus.com/why_i_should_get_a_beta_for_twine/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 02:11:26 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why I should get a beta for Twine?</title><link>http://mndoci.com/2008/03/13/why-i-should-get-a-beta-to-twine/#comment-1308967</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They're definitely playing it safe.  It's got a ways to go in terms of usability.  I'll post my own review once I have built up a sufficient network and content.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The way I look at it, look at it as an application that extracts entity information from your content and uses that to build a graph of linked data (under the hood) and serve up recommendations and content based on that.  It reminds me of Calais to a degree, but it's meant to be an application and not a service (at least at this point).  Will be very interesting to see how it evolves.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Deepak Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 02:11:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I should get a beta for Twine?</title><link>http://mndoci.com/2008/03/13/why-i-should-get-a-beta-to-twine/#comment-1308965</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd been hearing more and more talk about Twine again recently and thought maybe they'd opened up, but that doesn't seem to be the case.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That said, I haven't seen it work of course and I wonder how exactly it would be going to help me and what with.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nap Fisker</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:54:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>