<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>bbgm - the discussion - Latest Comments in We need more LEAP</title><link>http://mndoci.disqus.com/</link><description>At the interface of science and computing</description><atom:link href="https://mndoci.disqus.com/we_need_more_leap/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:32:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: We need more LEAP</title><link>http://mndoci.com/blog/2008/03/16/we-need-more-leap/#comment-1308979</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Absolutely agree that developers should educate consumers.  Part of the problem is that consumers are used to behemoth application suites (think MS Office), which try to do everything and as a result, do no one thing well.  At the other extreme is the UNIX/Linux philosophy:  many small tools/libraries, each of which are very good at one task, which you chain together (the original pipeline) to achieve larger tasks.  The problem is that consumers don't care about computing philosophy - they want stuff that resembles what they know.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've developed a few web apps for biologists and I often hear "it's great - but could it do this too?"  And this...oh, and maybe this.  It's good to learn how to say "it could, but it's not going to and here's why" :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:32:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>