<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>bbgm - the discussion - Latest Comments in High-risk, high-reward and the NIH</title><link>http://mndoci.disqus.com/</link><description>At the interface of science and computing</description><atom:link href="https://mndoci.disqus.com/high_risk_high_reward_and_the_nih/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:09:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: High-risk, high-reward and the NIH</title><link>http://mndoci.com/blog/2008/06/12/high-risk-high-reward-and-the-nih/#comment-670646</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The system is crap.  For postdocs (as an example), by the time one submits a proposal, receives the results, and (might) receive the funding (&amp;gt;1-2 yrs), it's time to move on.  A fast track system is needed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Franco</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:09:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>