<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>bbgm - the discussion - Latest Comments in Around the web - November 11, 2007</title><link>http://mndoci.disqus.com/</link><description>At the interface of science and computing</description><atom:link href="https://mndoci.disqus.com/around_the_web_november_11_2007/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:57:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Around the web - November 11, 2007</title><link>http://mndoci.com/blog/2007/11/11/around-the-web-november-11-2007/#comment-1306107</link><description>&lt;p&gt;First limitation, swf only at this point of time.  The options available are a fraction of what you get with camtasia.  The killer feature is ease of use.  it's significantly more lightweight, and for informal screencasting, I'd say its the cats whiskers. Oh .. and, for now at least, its free (but I'd pay snagit level money for it)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mndoci</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:57:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Around the web - November 11, 2007</title><link>http://mndoci.com/blog/2007/11/11/around-the-web-november-11-2007/#comment-1306106</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jing looks very interesting - what are the limitations compared to Camtasia?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jean-Claude Bradley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:34:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>